Im not sure if it was ported or designed for. Seems like an workflow that was designed years ago, with a fresh coat of paint. While I did like the way some things were approached. I was often left feeling amazed at the lack of adjustability to tool pallets as there is none. No txt option for tool icons, and some of the commands require alot more input than VW. I guess I didnt realize how good we Vw users have it. Maybe that will change w more time in the software. As it looks like Ill be dealing in both.
Heck 2015 version seemed better than the most recent 2017 imo. Edited May 8, 2017 by Moto2. VW just cannot do some of the things I need it to do, or it takes an inordinate amount of time, like drafting a parking lot for example. Digital juicer for mac. With command keys in cad I can draft and average commercial parking lot in minutes. VW takes me much longer using buttons and it seems to get the lot into 3D is almost impossible without advanced 3D modeling.then you have to make changes. VW has some nice capabilities, but a lot of the tools seem sort of half developed, at least in the BIM world, which makes me question why we aren't just using CAD if modeling is such a pain. I guess it depends on your needs.
Well thats why I started this thread to get some additional opinions. I did fee the 3d aspect was simpler. Maybe id be more impressed with the windows version. Not being able to assign shortcut keys was a big downer.
Lack of scale bars and library type items was surprising. One huge thing is information feedback and smart hints. VW while not always clear does provide a explination in every field or on every tool.
While the command line does soething similar. I often was left wondering 'what does this do?'
Especially in menus and preference settings. Edited May 9, 2017 by Moto2. I learned cad through the command line in 2002, still using it today. I type virtually every command. I use almost none of the other buttons and toolbars. Actually I usually have them all closed so I am essentially working with a big black screen.
You can imitate VW's WYSIWYG style by working through paperspace with plot style display box checked. Theres a rhythm to it that I have just been unable to match in vw. FOr now, I'm using vw to do quick site model studies, but precision drafting and documents are still done in Autocad unfortunately. Last September I took on some 3rd year students who had been using ACAD for 2-years and had to teach them VW.
As we approach the end of the academic year it was interesting to see the students reaction. Some fell by the wayside and went to SketchUp (students always try to take the path of least resistance and look back and regret it), some carried on with ACAD and some with VW. No surprise there but (hand on heart) the output from the VW students was far superior than anything else. Maybe because they had dedicated support (me) but I think that only accounts for part of it. Once they were up and running they had very few issues at all and their 3D work was great and they generally found it much more intuitive.
Cad command prompt has 2 issues with it imo. Canon australia driver for mac os. It requires you know all the commands. So if you dont your limited right from the get go. I find it far more easy to hit A key for a tool rather tan typing the word and sifting thru the multiple functions and then having to select and return. Requires more keystrokes.
Not command line related. But I found it silly that the command im in doesnt hold. I have to right click or hit return to reactivate that same command. So drawing 3 lines requires activating the command 3 times, why not hold the command until its deactivated?? It took me a while to get used to that. I also prefer vw object info pallet over the list command.
No need for any command just have a glace and its all right there. Command line feels ancient to me.
Def not old school haha. Anyone who works in this industry (geezer or newbe) should watch the outstanding Webinar that VW hosted earlier today. To quote one of the presenters ' The question isn't is BIM coming? BIM is here & how we are going to work' (or words to that effect). Sketching is fine, I've carried a pen & sketch book since school in the 70's & 80's. But a tool that not just creates, but develops an artistic vision into all that the AEC & related industries do, is BIM. The beauty of VW is it is BIM AND it allows one to take the 2D stuff to become part of a BIM world.
It may take some 0.5% more time to draw stuff than in ACAD but the payoff is huge. Is VW perfect? (hello stair tool) and as I say I'd like it to work more like SU from time to time on PD & CD But VW makes our firm much more productive than many that I work with.
On the landscape/landmark side I have to say there is quite a bit still to be desired, but I understand our industry probably isnt a top priority. The fact that NNA is developing landscape arch specific tools is pretty good as it is. I getthe BIM thing-It's what brought me here in the first place.
To create Lava Radio review we checked Lavaradio.com reputation at lots of sites, including Siteadvisor and MyWOT. Unfortunately, we did not find sufficient information whether Lavaradio is safe for children or does not look fraudulent. Lavaradio for mac.
I triedn archicad and revit as well. My partner picked up acad in about two weeks ten years ago, she is struggling to even get started with vw. It would be good if nna offered free video training. There are a lot of random tutorials on specific tools, but not enough on the day-to-day operations. Today for example I just needed to get a model out for sketchup for another consultant.
3Ds works fine, but lone behold you have to import in milimeters even though Im working in feet and inches.a lot of weid quirks in vw I cant quite undertsand. Just an observation on the whole 2d vs 3d work flow. I have a small job that requires me to draw plan, sections and exterior elevations all in 2d lines (they work in auto cad & just want simple) so.2d line work is fast & there are never any crashes or problems however this is what i also noticed. 2d drafting is a 1 to 1 workflow.
What i mean is that i draw one line i harvest one line. I model one object i harvest many things. I get: 6 views (that are connected to each other i.e. Edit one and they all adjust) volume massing ability to count each object etc granted 3d is slower at start up but delivers in the end. Its like this 'i challenge you to a 10 mile race' so you immediately start to run and get a head start on me. Whereas i go into the shed get my bike, pump up the tires, and start pedaling.
Who is faster? Been direct modeling (no parametric) since Fall of 2014 & have never looked back. Have an extensive 3d library, so most of my time is spent just assembling 3d objects rather than making them cannot see why anyone would chose to work in 2d as their workflow. (just to be fair, i still do some 2d work & it has its place).
. Create and edit 2D geometry. Create and edit 3D models with solids, surfaces, and mesh objects. Annotate drawings with text, dimensions, leaders, and tables. Customize the ribbon and tool palettes. Customize with add-on apps and APIs. Extract object data to tables.
Attach and import data from PDF files. Share and use data from DGN files, Navisworks, and Bing Maps. Apply and monitor CAD standards. Access specialized toolsets for architecture, mechanical design, electrical design, and more.
Compare Specifies the first dimension style for the comparison. With Specifies the second dimension style for the comparison. If you set the second style to or to the same style as the first, all the properties of the dimension style are displayed. Comparison results are displayed automatically under the following headings:. Description of the dimension style property. System variable that controls the property.
System variable values of style properties that differ for each dimension style Results Displays the results of the dimension style comparison. If you compare two different styles, the properties that differ are displayed. If you set the second style to or to the same style as the first, all the properties of the dimension style are displayed. Copy to Clipboard button Copies the results of the comparison to the Clipboard. You can then paste the results to other applications, such as word processors and spreadsheets.
Best Answer: 1. There is absolutely no differences in the commands. The only major differences is in the layout of the program.
![]()
It loses the ribbon and looks more like AutoCAD classic setup. I prefer this but I know many people who like the ribbon but that's all personal preference. While this is changed like I said all the commands are the same. Yes you can open older version PC drawings on it.
I have 2011 on my Mac and 2010 on PC and it has had no problem with transferring drawings form the PC to Mac. The file extension is DWG. This is pretty much the same program the only difference is that it is on Mac. Whatever you can do on the PC with AutoCAD you can do in the Mac version.
Answered by Eric C from Monroeville. Nov 3, 2010. There are a couple of major differences between the two, the first of which being the look and feel of the program. On the PC version they have what is known as the ribbon layout where you find most of your commands, and on the Mac it has a bare bones appeal maximizing workspace. I have found that on the mac you almost have to know the keyboard shortcuts for the commands or you'll never find them. Also, you cannot create dynamic blocks on the mac version at all, you need to import the block after it has been created on PC in order to use them. Answered by Keevin L from Anchorage.
Apr 10, 2014.
AutoCAD a program for architectural and engineering professionals that works to review the many different drawings that may be used within a project. In particular, a user can load up a diagram or other drawing and edit it in real time while sharing it with other people. This is and 3D modeling needs alike. It allows users to edit individual objects within any illustration or other special program. And altered through a series of technical controls that makes it easy for people to adjust the items that they are reviewing in real time.
In addition, people can review items within AutoCAD from any angle that they want. This means that the design process can be fully three-dimensional. There is no need for anyone to worry about having to switch from one document or file to another as everything devoted to one particular product or design feature will be highlighted within just one open file.
Design by CBS AutoDesk Inventor AutoDesk Inventor is designed for those who are looking to create 3D digital prototypes of different objects. Inventor also helps with the overall simulation process of illustrating how individual products and prototypes can work. One of the most popular features of Inventor is that it operates with its own motion simulation feature. Information on the driving features and friction components within an item can be uploaded while the user can also test a product on Inventor to review how well individual items work.
This program uses many specific file formats for individual parts and assemblies. It also uses an extensive geometry-based engine designed to ensure that all readouts and analysis reports are generated in real time and will not be harder to use or review than necessary.
When used right, it can create a better design that is very easy for all to use and control no matter what is going to be edited. Design by Bolek Lolek AutoCAD vs. Inventor AutoCAD and Inventor are both different primarily in that AutoCAD works with the purpose of while Inventor is for those who want to actually test something in motion.
For instance, to design a robotic machine while Inventor can help simulate how that machine would actually move while in use. Each program has its own design features dedicated to creating the most realistic depictions of how individual products are to be used. AutoCAD is often used more than Inventor as it is designed to ensure that the right materials are to be created before any tests are to be used. AutoCAD especially helps people to review diagrams and drawings of prototypes and makes it very easy for people to share information in real time. Inventor may not be used too often when compared with but it can be perfect for when the user has to work with very specific technical aspects of a program or device. It can show details on how individual parts of a prototype may interact with each other and function over time. Final Thought Overall, AutoCAD and Inventor are two that are very different from one another in terms of what they can do.
However, if they are paired together then it can be very easy for any business to do more with regards to designing different items for sale or for use in a workplace. AutoCAD will help with the process of designing an item and seeing how it works. Inventor will create a virtual test of a product as it is in its development and design stages.
Autocad Software Mac
When used properly, anyone could have a very easy time with handling the processes associated with creating different items. All businesses that have a need to design new products or procedures should consider what they can get out of these two individual products and how they may be used as required.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |